In our research and advisory practice, the question of how to select an ideal-fit billing solution comes up perennially. The answer to this question is primarily a function of two variables: 

  1. How large is the volume of invoices?
  2. How complex are the billing transactions? 

In this MarketLens™ Report, we map a select group of billing software products against a set of coordinates that combines Billing Volume (BV) and Billing Complexity (BC). 

The companies selected for this MarketLens are a cross-section of vendors covered in our Agile Monetization practice and not meant to be an exhaustive catalog of every possible billing solution on the market. Placement of companies represents typical use case sweet spot, not the absolute maximum performance – which is typically more of a range. We aimed for selecting what in our view would represent the best use case with the least amount of friction.

Get the report to find out where each of the following suppliers fall on the Billing Volume vs. Complexity MarketLens.

Companies Mentioned In This MarketLens:

Amdocs Optima FinancialForce Ordway
Aptitude Software FuseBill Piano.io
BillingPlatform GoodSign Recharge
Binary Stream Gotransverse Recurly
BluLogix JustOn RecVue
Cerillion Skyline LogiSense Rev.io
Chargebee Matrixx Sage Intacct
ChargeOver Netcracker Salesforce
Chargify NitroBox SAP
Cheddar OneBill Vindicia
Cleeng OpenCell Workday
CSG Oracle Zone & Co.
Evergent Oracle NetSuite Zuora

Get the report to find out where each supplier falls on the Billing Volume vs. Complexity MarketLens.

About MGI MarketLens™ Reports: An MGI MarketLens Report dissects a given universe of suppliers and plots how a select group of suppliers compare using a pair of key coordinates. It sheds light on the variations among solutions in a given market, and helps prospective buyers, investors, and partners see where products align relative to core requirements.