In our research and advisory practice, the question of how to select an ideal-fit billing solution comes up perennially. The answer to this question is primarily a function of two variables:
- How large is the volume of invoices?
- How complex are the billing transactions?
In this MarketLens™ Report, we map a select group of billing software products against a set of coordinates that combines Billing Volume (BV) and Billing Complexity (BC).
The companies selected for this MarketLens are a cross-section of vendors covered in our Agile Monetization practice and not meant to be an exhaustive catalog of every possible billing solution on the market. Placement of companies represents typical use case sweet spot, not the absolute maximum performance – which is typically more of a range. We aimed for selecting what in our view would represent the best use case with the least amount of friction.
Get the report to find out where each of the following suppliers fall on the Billing Volume vs. Complexity MarketLens.
Companies Mentioned In This MarketLens:
| Amdocs Optima | FinancialForce | Ordway |
| Aptitude Software | FuseBill | Piano.io |
| BillingPlatform | GoodSign | Recharge |
| Binary Stream | Gotransverse | Recurly |
| BluLogix | JustOn | RecVue |
| Cerillion Skyline | LogiSense | Rev.io |
| Chargebee | Matrixx | Sage Intacct |
| ChargeOver | Netcracker | Salesforce |
| Chargify | NitroBox | SAP |
| Cheddar | OneBill | Vindicia |
| Cleeng | OpenCell | Workday |
| CSG | Oracle | Zone & Co. |
| Evergent | Oracle NetSuite | Zuora |
